Compare and contrastRhino Mocks vs. Hand Rolled Stubs
time to read 1 min | 117 words

For various reasons which will be made clear soon, I needed to write the same test twice, once using Rhino Mocks, the second time using hand rolled stubs. I thought it was an interesting exercise, since this is not demo level code. 

[Test]
public void WillCallHandlesWithWithRouteTestHanlderWhenRouteCalled_UsingRhinoMocks()
{
	const IQuackFu msg = null;

	var mocks = new MockRepository();

	var routing = dslFactory.Create<RoutingBase>(@"Routing\simple.boo");

	var mockedRouting = (RoutingBase)mocks.PartialMock(routing.GetType());
	Expect.Call(() => mockedRouting.HandleWith(null, null))
		.Constraints(Is.Equal(typeof(RoutingTestHandler)), Is.Anything());

	mocks.ReplayAll();

	mockedRouting.Initialize(msg);

	mockedRouting.Route();

	mocks.VerifyAll();
}

[Test]
public void WillCallHandlesWithWithRouteTestHanlderWhenRouteCalled()
{
	const IQuackFu msg = null;

	dslFactory.Register<StubbedRoutingBase>(new StubbedRoutingDslEngine());

	var routing = dslFactory.Create<StubbedRoutingBase>(@"Routing\simple.boo");

	routing.Initialize(msg);

	routing.Route();

	Assert.AreEqual(typeof (RoutingTestHandler), routing.HandlerType);

	Assert.IsInstanceOfType(
		typeof(NewOrderMessage), 
		routing.Transformer()
		);
}
Tweet Share Share 0 comments
Tags:

More posts in "Compare and contrast" series:

  1. (02 Apr 2012) Performance implications of method signatures
  2. (20 May 2008) Rhino Mocks vs. Hand Rolled Stubs