Just had one looking at the tests*; one minute I couldn't get what they were trying to do, and the second I got it and it was like: "This is so smart!"

Me and ReSharper and going through the code with an pickaxe and venegence in our eyes. I'm devoted user of ReSharper for a long time, and I can't believe how easy it is to do refactorying. It's like having an army of little coders that runs and do what I want, mostly without concious thought. This tool is smart. I'm making countless changes to the code, the code compiles, the tests pass, and I don't have to do anything more than will it.

One strange thing, I keep bumping into code like this:

Anyone can think of a reason to do that?

* This is the first time I'd to read other people's tests, I'm starting to get why XP is so keen of them.

As I said, EasyMock.Net looks pretty impressive, but it still has a very strong Java background, meaning javadoc comments, all caps enumerations, etc. First things first, I needed to .Net it. I am constantly surprised by how wrong a feeling a different coding style can give me.

• Renamed ArgumentsMatcher => IArgumentsMatcher
• Converted Javadoc comments to C#'s XML Comments - highly tedious process.
• Replaced Boolean => bool
• Replaced String => string
• Replaced Object => object
• Removed /*sealed*/ comment
• Removed useless cataches
• Replaced Throwable with Exception
• Replaced ALL_CAPS with CamelCasing for variables & enumerations
• Replaced MockControl's ONE with Once, ONE_OR_MORE with MoreThanOnce and ZERO_OR_MORE with Any

This is enough for now to give it far more dotNetty feeling than an imported Java library. Things that I want to do with it:

• Adding an easy way to add constraints.
• Allow to chain expectation.

More will follow, probably :-)

Interesting tidbit, a developer that asked whatever the project was still alive got the project assigned to him. :-)