One of screenshots contains button "Save" the other contains icon of diskette. I would recommend to stick with one or the other. (I would prefer "Save" because my kids doesn't even know what diskette is but it is well established icon.)
@ Steve - The ID is referring to a document and the Name is referring to an Index. They are different concepts, so the inconsistency is actually consistent ;)
As Simon pointed out, that is not what I meant. I meant layout. "ID" is valign top and "name" is valign bottom.
Other problems I see off the top of my head, Text Areas are handled differently in Pic 2 and Pic 3 as well (pic 3 is better IMO). I'm also not thrilled about the customize buttons being below "customize" and almost touching "field".
All nitpick-ish I know, but things that would drive me crazy.
Love the Metro style on top, but I think the icons are not in sync with the idea: rounded corners, bright colors and cartoony look don't go so well with Metro.
The UI is looking good for now, but I think that you're missing one fundamental point.
The zune-like UI is implemented in Zune. Zune is a multimedia software and using it is entertaining. On the other hand, your software is a data-intensive application which should be used easily and practically.
You cannot use big font with data intensive applications, you cannot use any fancy-looking UI (even if it gives an impression of being clean and minimal - but part from that minimalism is the space between elements) to an application where the most important aspect is the data that it presents, not the joy of using it.
Try to look at the available data-intensive apps and try to use the "standard" (or the data-centric) ones and compare that with the fancier and more exotic counterparts and you'll see.
Nice, but too fancy for a DB Admin app. Moreover, since its all about the .Net Eco System, I was wondering if there was a Visual Studio Plugin to do the DB Admin stuff, which may also harness some if its editing features... say IntelliSense :)
Comment preview
Comments have been closed on this topic.
Markdown formatting
ESC to close
Markdown turns plain text formatting into fancy HTML formatting.
Phrase Emphasis
*italic* **bold**
_italic_ __bold__
Links
Inline:
An [example](http://url.com/ "Title")
Reference-style labels (titles are optional):
An [example][id]. Then, anywhere
else in the doc, define the link:
[id]: http://example.com/ "Title"
> Email-style angle brackets
> are used for blockquotes.
> > And, they can be nested.
> #### Headers in blockquotes
>
> * You can quote a list.
> * Etc.
Horizontal Rules
Three or more dashes or asterisks:
---
* * *
- - - -
Manual Line Breaks
End a line with two or more spaces:
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Fenced Code Blocks
Code blocks delimited by 3 or more backticks or tildas:
```
This is a preformatted
code block
```
Header IDs
Set the id of headings with {#<id>} at end of heading line:
## My Heading {#myheading}
Tables
Fruit |Color
---------|----------
Apples |Red
Pears |Green
Bananas |Yellow
Definition Lists
Term 1
: Definition 1
Term 2
: Definition 2
Footnotes
Body text with a footnote [^1]
[^1]: Footnote text here
Abbreviations
MDD <- will have title
*[MDD]: MarkdownDeep
FUTURE POSTS
Partial writes, IO_Uring and safety - about one day from now
Configuration values & Escape hatches - 4 days from now
What happens when a sparse file allocation fails? - 6 days from now
NTFS has an emergency stash of disk space - 8 days from now
Challenge: Giving file system developer ulcer - 11 days from now
And 4 more posts are pending...
There are posts all the way to Feb 17, 2025
RECENT SERIES
Challenge
(77): 20 Jan 2025 - What does this code do?
Answer
(13): 22 Jan 2025 - What does this code do?
Comments
Wow, Metro inspired?
I really like it!
But wasn't there a web interface?
Looking very nice, I do like the Metro UI, is this a web based still or have you implemented it Silverlight/WPF?
Igal, there is a web interface, but we want to move to a more capable platform for the things we want
I don't really like it. I'm sorry, it looks like a really bad flash website to me. The Prof interface is much nicer IMO.
Looks nice, but I'd like to get a nice color palette like in the Uber Prof :P
I like it! Looks a bit like the Zune software UI, with the less-is-more, let-the-UI-get-out-of-the-way idea.
One of screenshots contains button "Save" the other contains icon of diskette. I would recommend to stick with one or the other. (I would prefer "Save" because my kids doesn't even know what diskette is but it is well established icon.)
Very Nice!! I've been thinking about RavenDB lately for some upcoming work too.
Further nitpick, the vertical alignments are also inconsistant (for example, "ID" in the second pic v. "name" in the third pic).
Consistency is paramount in good UI development.
@ Steve - The ID is referring to a document and the Name is referring to an Index. They are different concepts, so the inconsistency is actually consistent ;)
@Jarf - Steve isn't talking about the inconsistently in naming - but the inconsistency in element (label/textbox) alignment between screens.
@Jarf,
As Simon pointed out, that is not what I meant. I meant layout. "ID" is valign top and "name" is valign bottom.
Other problems I see off the top of my head, Text Areas are handled differently in Pic 2 and Pic 3 as well (pic 3 is better IMO). I'm also not thrilled about the customize buttons being below "customize" and almost touching "field".
All nitpick-ish I know, but things that would drive me crazy.
What's that thing above the red X on the last image? What's it supposed to do?
What Silverlight editor control are you using? Have you seen the Actipro one? It has IntelliSense and QuickInfo and a bunch of other features.
www.actiprosoftware.com/.../default.aspx
Love the Metro style on top, but I think the icons are not in sync with the idea: rounded corners, bright colors and cartoony look don't go so well with Metro.
I like the new look. Though I'm surprised no one has commented on the obvious abbreviation for Raven DB Management Studio => RDBMS. :-)
Looks excciting but too many fonts spoil the appearance.
Will the index screen of this UI include creating/editing of the TransformResults part of an index? This would be really useful.
David,
Yes, it would
I can't see where can I do patch operations ... are they part of current release ?
Jalchr,
"first look", remember?
The UI is looking good for now, but I think that you're missing one fundamental point.
The zune-like UI is implemented in Zune. Zune is a multimedia software and using it is entertaining. On the other hand, your software is a data-intensive application which should be used easily and practically.
You cannot use big font with data intensive applications, you cannot use any fancy-looking UI (even if it gives an impression of being clean and minimal - but part from that minimalism is the space between elements) to an application where the most important aspect is the data that it presents, not the joy of using it.
Try to look at the available data-intensive apps and try to use the "standard" (or the data-centric) ones and compare that with the fancier and more exotic counterparts and you'll see.
Karim,
The reasons for this UI aren't so much for providing a data centric app.
It is expected that you'll mostly work with the code, this is just to allow you to peek into the database, administer it and watch what is going on.
Nice, but too fancy for a DB Admin app. Moreover, since its all about the .Net Eco System, I was wondering if there was a Visual Studio Plugin to do the DB Admin stuff, which may also harness some if its editing features... say IntelliSense :)
Comment preview